Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.092
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL BISNIS STRATEGI Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako Dinamika Hukum ULUL ALBAB Abdimas Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia Students´ Journal of Economic and Management Jurnal Rekavasi At-Taradhi: Jurnal Studi Ekonomi YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam AKSIOMA JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA Jurnal Teknologi Laboratorium PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PROGRAM PASCASARJANA JURNAL HUKUM ISLAM Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Edukasi Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam Jurnal Sistem Informasi (JSI) RISDA: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam Makara Journal of Science
Muhaimin Muhaimin
Universitas Stikubank Semarang
Religion Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 50 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Dinamika Hukum

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS PELAKSANAAN SISTEM PEMBEBANAN PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MUHAIMIN, MUHAIMIN
Dinamika Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2018): DINAMIKA HUKUM
Publisher : Dinamika Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Proof is the central point of court in a court case. Proof is also a provision that regulates the instruments of evidence that are justified by the law and which the judge may use to prove the guilt of the indictment. Corruption is classified as an extraordinary crime (extra ordinary crime). the application of the reverse verification system does indeed appear to be something that ties with human rights. The application of a reversed evidentiary system should be placed in the context of a balance between the rights of the defendant and the rights of all the people. The problems studied in this research are: (1) How to Conduct Proof of Corruption in Corruption Court? (2) What are the Constraints Constraints faced in Corruption Proofing in Corruption Court in Corruption Court? The research method used in this research is qualitative research and descriptive research type with empirical juridical approach. Data analysis method used in this research is data collection, data reduction, data presentation, conclusion. Result of the research: (1) reverse proof is a deviation from the provisions of KUHAP which determines that the prosecutor is obliged to prove the criminal act, open the defendant. Under this provision the defendant can prove that he is not committing a criminal act of corruption. If the defendant can prove it does not mean he is not proven to be corrupt, because the prosecutor is still obliged to prove his indictment. (2) Lack of equality of perception of law enforcers in applying and performing reverse verification In practice in Corruption Court, reversed proof is applied depending on what is in the indictment of the prosecutor, as long as the prosecutor does not indict anything related to reverse verification then the Panel of Judges there is no basis for doing reverse proof. The conclusion of this research is: If the defendant can prove it does not mean he is not proven to be corrupt, because the public prosecutor is still obliged to prove his indictment. Suggestions of this research are: Improvement of the contents and weaknesses of Law Number 20 Year 2001 on Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Corruption. Keywords: Corruption, reversed proof, Corruption Court
Co-Authors 07.05.51.0117 Putri Puspasari 08.05.51.0053 Ariya Fajar Baskoro 08.3502.0560 Rahadijanti Hutami Kurniawati 0835020555 Ihsan Nur Handoyo 09.05.51.0077 Meidhita Andrie Laksono 10.05.51.0037 Yuyun Eko Nurcahyati 10.05.51.0071 Sunita 10.05.51.0090 Anggi Febriyanti Ahmad Junaidi Amaliya, Mirza Isna Amanda, Hilda Arum Yudha Andini, 15.05.51.0287 Eleonora Puspita Yuana, 13.05.51.0183 Eleonora Puspita Yuana, 13.05.51.0183 Enty Nur Hayati Harizon Harizon Harjono, Harry Soedarto Imam Sodikin Indra Lasmana Tarigan Ishak, Putri Mutiara Kamid Kamid Lailatul Muqmiroh Madyawati Latief Mohammad Zulfan Anas, 13.05.51.0074 Mohammad Zulfan Anas, 13.05.51.0074 Muhammad Kristiawan Nur Ali Prahandika, Graha Presetya, Mirza Ardian Purwanto, 14.05.51.0199 Ridho, M.Rasyid Riza Nanda Ariyanto, 14.05.51.0047 Santoso, Ignatius Hari Sari, Amilia Kartika Setiawati, Rosy Sidarto Sidarto Sri Rahayuningsih Sudarman Sudarman Sukayasa Sukayasa Sundoro, 13.05.51.0115 Sundoro, 13.05.51.0115 Sutiah Sutiah Toto Suharmanto Wahab, Abd Yulianti, Nike Desvi Yuliya, Sri